Finally, the paper draws out a few implications for the analysis of power and resistance in confessional economies of power. The article argues that there is a similarity in the ‘effects of power’ made possible within these frameworks, particular regarding the legitimisation and application of discipline. In addition to being characterised as a ‘regime of truth’, Orientalist discourses also display the general properties of confessional discourses outlined in Foucault’s Will to Knowledge. Finally, a confessional perspective affords purchase on the nature of power, the formation of subjectivities, and the possibilities of resistance within Orientalist discursive con‐ texts, which Said’s own analysis is often said to lack. In this sense, a confessional perspective on Orientalism affords a broad view of the contemporary politics of truth in which Orientalism plays such as an im‐ portant part. The perspective this paper provides an insight into the in‐ ternal structure of Orientalist discourse connects this structure with Orientalism’s ‘effects of power’ affords purchase on both Orientalism’s organisational and ontogenetic properties helps explain the persistence of Orientalism – both overt and covert – despite three decades of post‐Orientalist scholarship.

Orientalism by Edward W. Said